31 March, 2010

Interesting but not exciting

I've finally got around to watching the "Chancellors' Debate", let's be honest it wasn't the most gripping TV was it?

I found the dynamic interesting, Cable and Darling very much on one side and Osborne on the other. Could this be the strongest indication yet of where the Lib Dems would sit in a hung parliament?

The media still give Cable a comically easy time and this showed in the program blatantly. As someone who rates Osborne highly I wasn't surprised that he did well Darling was OK too but no one really stole the show.

A bit of a no score draw.

1 comment:

Jimmy said...

That wasn't what I read in the Financial Times:

Mr Cable effortlessly dominated the debate on behalf of the Lib Dems, as he so often does. He probably said he had been right all along just once too often, though. In any case, it seemed to me there wasn't so much a clear winner as a loser - Mr Osborne.

But we all know that the media is controlled by Lib Dem supporting media tycoons. Perhaps the media just like somebody who seems to understand what they are talking about - I can't think why.