The case refers a letter sent out called "East meets West" and was clearly an attempt to raise her profile amongst voters that don't come into her constituency until the boundary changes take effect.
Ms Prentice's defence was that she didn't know that she wasn't supposed to send publicly funded literature to voters outside her own constituency!!!!!
How could she not understand that public money given to an MP to send leaflets to their constituents can only be used to send leaflets the THEIR own constituents?
You may think that I'm being a bit cynical, but Bridget has form in this area. Have a look at the last two paragraphs of this post from the lead up to the 2005 election.