Too harsh!Henman was a superb player, and in fact won the ATP Masters by beating Federer and Roddick, amongst others. He would surely have won Wimbledon were it not for the reign of Pete Sampras.Murray may go one better, and win a Grand Slam - but his notion that Henman couldn't hack it, or lacked some crucial sporting component is absurd.But Henman and Murray have one thing in common - dreadful post match interviews. Federer and Nadal are personifiations of charm. Why do our lads sounds utterly bored when talking to the press?
Post a Comment